Advertising

You are currently browsing the archive for the Advertising category.

In Canada the language laws require all packaging to be bilingual - English and French, and both languages must be given equal prominence, which means, letter for letter, all the type has to be the same size, in both languages.

For designers it's a balancing act that often teeters on the edge, because French invariably requires more verbiage, to say the same things as English and when you're faced with detailed blocks of legal, the copy can easily overwhelm things. It takes a lot of finagling to ensure that all that copy (which no one ever reads) doesn't completely destroy the integrity of the design.

But designers are a hearty bunch. Those of us who do a lot of packaging and signage learned, long ago, to take the space requirements for two languages into consideration at the beginning of a design project. I pride myself on the fact that while I can't speak French without embarrassing myself, I can at least, typeset it, as ably as any Francophone. So I feel a bit petty bringing up this next point, but I feel it has to be said.

I'm unimpressed with the fact that while those of us in "the rest of Canada" are programmed, early-on, to consider the French language to be of equal importance to English, the same does not apply toward English, in Quebec.

In Quebec, English copy must, legally, be 50% of the size of French copy. This strikes me as discriminatory, elitist and, frankly, unfair. I did a bit of research on the subject and uncovered a couple of other issues related to the topic that I might as well share here.

In Quebec, new immigrant students are not permitted to attend English schools, whether or not they come from Anglo families.

Last year, an Irish pub in downtown Montreal came under investigation by the Office québécois de la langue française (essentially the language police) for having classic Irish signage, in English, inside the pub.

Here's my point. Everyone on earth knows that Quebec is the French province in Canada. We've all heard the arguments for preserving the unique French flavor of the province and I even agree with a lot of it, but I don't think they're in any danger of losing that "uniqueness" at this point, so what's with the discriminatory attitude toward English and English speakers? And why is it allowed to continue in this day and age? What do you think?

Share
The Jerusalem Post has an article today, regarding Tuesday's launch of jerusalem.com. A new website that, in the words of co-founder and CEO Michael Weiss will "...create a bridge between a physical location, Jerusalem, and people on the other side of the planet." The site itself is a commercial venue, divided into various hubs for things like tourism, religion, prayer, real estate and city culture. It's a solid attempt to bring the vibrant and diverse personality of today's Jerusalem to the rest of the world. And they paid $750,000 for the domain name. From personal experience I can tell you that any domain name with the word "Black" in it has already been scooped up by some enterprising company or individual, hoping to turn it around and make big bucks on the resale. And from time to time we hear about big money being spent to secure a particular domain, so my curiosity was picqued and I did a bit of searching to see just how lucrative a business it actually is. So with no further ado, here's a list of the top prices paid for domain names (keeping in mind that often, the amount of cash that actually changes hands is different, when other benefits to the seller, like advertising deals, etc. are factored in.) 10. vodka.com $3 million 9. wine.com $3.3 million 8. korea.com $5 million 7. asSeenonTV.com $5 million 6. casino.com $5.5 million 5. business.com $7.5 million 4. diamond.com $7.5 million 3. porn.com $9.5 million 2. fund.com $10 million 1. sex.com $12 million
Share
I love graphic design that predates the camera. Makes the simple poster feel like "Art". Here's a great example from Color + Design blog, a series of circus ads/posters.
Share
Four new Mac ads launched yesterday. It's amusing to note that Apple's response to Microsoft's recent, relentless attack ads has been no response at all. In fact Apple continues to push the same message, which Microsoft has steadfastly avoided addressing in their ads - that Macs provide a better, more reliable user experience. And while three years may seem like a long run for a single-message concept, the ads are still fun, and funny.
Share
Ever since I read about Tim Roth and Gary Oldman writing sexy messages to each other on various magazine covers, I've been in love with the idea of brands communicating with each other in advertising. Audi and BMW are the latest to do so, and for that they get inclusion in Little Black Blog's "Great Creative", the pantheon of kickass creative. Here's the outdoor campaign.
Share
Breaking News! Well kinda. Okay, not really. With everyone scrambling to find ways to monetize Twitter, I was excited to find news this morning from Financial Times, about the launch of a new marketing agency in London, devoted specifically to Twitter, and that it's being run by some heavyweight dotcom enterpreneurs ...
Dotcom veterans in Twitter ‘brains trust’ By Tim Bradshaw, Digital Media Correspondent Published: April 8 2009 23:33 | Last updated: April 8 2009 23:33 Some of the best-known names in the London dotcom world are joining forces to cash in on the popularity of Twitter, the rapidly growing social network. Twitter Partners said that it will help brands, media companies and celebrities to monitor and market themselves on the network, which allows more than 4m users to post 140-character updates to their list of “followers”.
Despite the hype, it turns out that they're still trying to figure out how to make money from it too. Oh well.
Share
Social media has blurred the line between traditional Marketing and Public Relations.

According to a PR Rep I had lunch with today, Public Relations firms are running into a problem with clients who don't see the value anymore, in a newspaper write-up.

Traditional Marketing and Advertising too are suffering, from a form of consumer fatigue. Many of my contemporaries in the business now think that our audiences hate to be marketed to, and, that they no longer trust the stories we tell them about products and brands. I'm not convinced this is true*, but I'm willing to go along with the idea for the sake of argument here.

Enter social media which is being hailed as the next big thing in brand promotion. Social media firms are sprouting up all over, like mushrooms after a rain, but what do they do exactly? We thought about this and came up with this list, for starters:

1. They champion brands at the grassroots level with viral marketing. Planting "brand champions" or "influencers" who target a demographic on Twitter, Facebook, blogs and the like. (This reminds me of a really old shampoo commercial.)

2. They host viral marketing events online (think Skittles), and in real life. In real life these events can be small, intimate affairs with a few hand-picked friends, or full blown Events in clubs with live music, free food and an open bar. By the way, housewives have been engaging in viral marketing and earning modest incomes for decades, selling everything from make-up to sex aids, thanks to Brownie Wise (the woman who invented the Tupperware Party).

Then there's the more delicate blurring of the lines:

3. For instance, if you're tasked to turn-around a dormant or flagging brand, and market it to a whole new demographic, all of the traditional marketing tools come into play in order to research the brand, identify the desired market and figure out how to sell to them. If you want to sell tequila to the male 18-36 crowd,  you'll target places or events that draw your market (say, like, bars?). You'll partner with the bars over a period of time and in addition to offering free drinks, or branded merchandise, you'll host a live music event, or rent the place out and throw invitation-only parties.

4. They find influential brand champions (superstar endorsers).

5. They use one product to help promote another product thereby boosting the awareness of both brands. This is basically sponsorship but subtly and creatively disguised.

6. Pop-up retail. Basically a temporary retail outlet done 'boutique' or gallery style. If a temporary store opens for a couple of months, the cost is roughly equivalent to a billboard campaign, but has the added benefit of providing a venue in which, consumers can interact with and BUY products. Direct access to, and experience with a product definitely trumps looking at an ad... Speaking of which, I got a direct-mail piece from Nivea the other day with three samples of some new beauty cream products - boy was I excited. I love Nivea! (ed: way to sneak in an example of viral marketing, and draw a parallel between DM and pop-up retail)

Anyway, all of these strategies share one thing... they lack a story, or more precisely, the story is created on the fly, by consumers. Though obviously when a giant like Apple uses these tactics, they bring their story to the mix as well.

The way I see it, traditional marketers and PR firms need to start offering some new strategies, or risk losing clients to the new breed social media firms who are essentially Marketers, PR Reps and Event Planners all rolled into one.

*By the way, I strongly believe that a good story is still King when it comes to building brand loyalty. The current wave of advertising fatigue is due to audiences being so inundated with bad stories, that good advertising gets a bad rap, by mere association.

Share
Informative article this morning at BusinessWeek, about the companies that are using Twitter effectively. (In other words, using the medium as a two-way street and not as a PR megaphone). These people are listening.
Share
My moral compass is pinging all over the place because of this story. It's not that I have trouble believing that MoMA might be complicit, even though they're claiming not to be, or that "the Matisse of subway-ad mash-ups", Poster Boy has lost his fragile boho-artiste street cred by selling his art to an ad agency, or that an ad agency would destroy it's own advertising to garner publicity... it's just that if it's all a put on, it's so multi-layered that it's either brilliant or really annoying. I'm an eternal optimist, so I vote for brilliant, but I'll let you be the judge.
Share

Newer entries »

Powered by Netfirms